Dear Readers:
James says she “freaks out when she hears people say that her book encourages domestic violence. “Nothing freaks me out more than people who say this is about domestic abuse,” she says. “Bringing up my book in this context trivializes the issues, doing women who actually go through it a huge disservice. It also demonizes loads of women who enjoy this lifestyle, and ignores the many, many women who tell me they’ve found the books sexually empowering.”
- No one is talking about BDSM being abusive, you fucking lunatic. The elements of the relationship that are abusive have nothing to do with the incredibly mild BDSM in the book. Even though the BDSM is shitty and unsafe and portrayed as a mental disease, the BDSM sequences aren’t really where the abuse happens. The abuse happens in all the places where Christian asserts his dominance over Ana outside of the bedroom, by stalking her (showing up at her work, following her across the country when she’s asked him for space, putting money into her bank account – the number for which he got through a private investigator), refusing her any agency (she must be followed by his “security team” – read: spies – anywhere she goes, her clothes are purchased for her by a shopper who knows Christian’s tastes, he even tells her when and what to eat and bought her job), and getting her drunk (read: drugging her) to get her to consent to shit she doesn’t want to do. All that stuff is abusive. Tying her up and making her listen to Medieval chant while he fucks her? No one thinks that’s abusive.
- Bringing up the abuse in your book doesn’t trivialize the issue, you fucking lunatic. You know what does trivialize the issue? Ignoring very real concerns about the abuse in the book because you don’t want to admit you’re just a shitty writer or a shitty person and you don’t care about abused women at all because you’re making tons of money and omg, everyone is being so mean about the shitty book you wrote about a shitty guy who abuses a woman. Talking about an issue in a serious way doesn’t “trivialize” it. It brings awareness to people who might have been wrong in their thinking. The only problem is, the people – like E.L. James – who most need to listen and learn about why they’re propagating dangerous cultural stereotypes about what women need or want, refuse to listen. So, by dismissing the issue, E.L., you’re really the one doing the trivializing.
- Protecting women from abuse doesn’t endanger the sexual preferences of women who like BDSM. Look, I’m going to say it. I love to be submissive during sex. I love to get spanked, bitten, slapped, choked, I like to have my hair pulled, to get fucked hard, you name something perverted and I am into it, so long as the person doing it to me is calling me a cheap slut while he’s doing it (and also as long as it’s Safe, Sane, and Consensual). Do I realize that some people feel that’s dirty, bad, and wrong? Yeah, but fuck them. Because it doesn’t matter if other people think that I’m gross or depraved or fucked in the head, because I know that’s not the case. There’s no reason for anyone to try to protect me from what I want to do in the bedroom. And I don’t need E.L. James to defend my lifestyle choices, either, so she doesn’t need to be the champion for all the poor, repressed women out there who like BDSM. There is, however, lots of reasons that we need to protect women who are being abused from abuse, namely because our culture won’t. It’s not setting back the sexual revolution to call out Christian Grey as an abuser pretending to be a Dom. It’s not taking away the sexual agency of women who like to masturbate to 50 Shades. It’s not “either, or” here. We can say, “Yes, freedom of sexual exploration is amazing, and what you do in your bedroom is not anyone else’s business,” while acknowledging that if the “Dom” attitude turns into an excuse to victimize and control a woman who doesn’t want to be a 24/7 sub, it has crossed the line from sex play into abuse. People in the BDSM community WANT to talk about this type of thing, and they were talking about it at length BEFORE 50 Shades came along. Now, E.L. wants to shut down that whole conversation as a matter of feminism, or something? Why? Because women are too stupid to handle nuanced issues? Or just because we can’t care about more than one thing at a time, and naturally jilling off to this piece of shit book is the highest priority, and we’ll get to the abuse later?
- Women going through, or who have gone through, domestic abuse are not fucking thrilled with 50 Shades. Before E.L. tries to stand up and say that she’s angry because highlighting the abuse in her books trivializes all those poor, battered women she supposedly cares so fucking much about, maybe she needs to talk to some of the women I’ve heard from. Maybe she needs to hear abuse victims saying, “You’re wrong,” so she could get it through her head. Oh, my bad. A lot of these same women HAVE tried to contact E.L. James, only to be blocked on twitter. That’s right. If you try to contact E.L. James with your heartfelt plea for understanding, based on your own personal experience at the hands of an abuser like Christian Grey, you’re going to find your twitter account blocked. Because she doesn’t want to hear it. The inability to listen to even the mildest criticism of her perfect, perfect hottie, Christian Grey, proves that E.L. James doesn’t get angry over those allegations on behalf of abused women. She doesn’t give enough of a shit about them to read 140 fucking characters, unless those characters are all glowing praise for her master work. Yeah, she really fucking cares about abused women, so much so that she sees their real-life experiences as an attack against her glorious creation (that’s making her so much money).
I can't believe the woman would be like that! Arrrgh! I was pulling my hair out and swearing like a sailor (my apologies to sailors) as I read this. Someone has a severe case of delusional. Arrrgh!
Wow. I knew she was a bad writer but I didn't realise she was a terrible person too. That's unfortunate. It makes me feel a lot better about taking the piss out of her godawful book though.
Bra-fucking-vo!
Excellent, Jenny. Good for you, and good for all the women speaking up about abuse (physical and emotional).
[…] post earlier, which led to her “calm and rational” approach. You can read that here: http://jennytrout.wordpress.com/2013/01/31/e-l-james-needs-to-shut-her-ignorant-mouth-about-abuse/ Be sure to give it a read. It’s therapeutic for me to know there are women out there […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: jennytrout.com/?p=966 […]
This woman and these “books” make me sick, and nothing is ever going to change that.
I want to thank you for separating out the issue so eloquently into its component points. As someone who fervently enjoys both reading and writing BDSM erotica, I have been frustrated by the portrayal of 50 Shades as a BDSM story since I read it as a fanfiction. What I like about your article is you give us the answers, and what you suggested as a script for E.L. James is almost word for word what I’ve been saying all along to anyone who will listen. It is ignorant and dangerous to avoid the abuse issue, and she does no favors to the BDSM community by selling the story as such. [And I learned a new phrase- “jilling off”!] Thank you.
Jenny Trout, I love you. I’d marry you in the minute, except for the fact that I’m a complete stranger who only came across your blog a week ago, and ya know… contrary to fiction’s worst dumbass, I feel we ougtha gave it some time.
More seriously, you’re a great person. I’ve been reading this recap and your other stuff, and enjoying the heck out of all that, but that post… It almost had me crying, because what you’re talking about is moving, and is true, and sould be fucking common sense, damn it. You can believe I am going to be sharing it in the future, especially when FSOG the movie will come out and we’ll have to wade through heaps of bullshit and romanticization of abuse all over again.
Please keep writing and being awesome, and all the best to you and your family.
Thank you.
Jenny Trout, I love you. I’d marry you in the minute, except for the fact that I’m a complete stranger who only came across your blog a week ago, and ya know… contrary to fiction’s worst dumbass, I feel we ougtha gave it some time.
More seriously, you’re a great person. I’ve been reading this recap and your other stuff, and enjoying the heck out of all that, but that post… It almost had me crying, because what you’re talking about is moving, and is true, and sould be fucking common sense, damn it. You can believe I am going to be sharing it in the future, especially when FSOG the movie will come out and we’ll have to wade through heaps of bullshit and romanticization of abuse all over again.
Please keep writing and being awesome, and all the best to you and your family.
Thank you.
on the bright side, 100,000,000 women are not as dumb as you jenny. they KNOW the books are fiction. maybe crap fiction, but hey who cares?
Such a brave anon.
Well, this comment of yours got approved back in January, and is the only other comment listed under your IP address and email address when I do a search. So is the problem that your comments aren’t getting approved, or you just don’t feel you’re getting enough attention for calling me dumb?
So… you’re calling Jenny dumb, and you think that’s a compliment?
EVERYBODY on Earth knows 50 Shades is fiction, but that does NOT excuse the author for being such a heartless twat toward REAL battered women.
Well Said!
The character of Christian in these books is the worst kind of pretender in the BDSM community, an abusive dominate is unhealthy not just for himself and his submissive but for anyone in the community they come into contact with. Additionally, in the books at least, there is at least one scene where she uses her safeword and is ignored! This constitutes rape. R-A-P-E, in a book that the author defends as a treatise on how BDSM works. So personally I find the books and film offensive to the BDSM community as well as to women. It paints the whole of the BDSM scene as obssessive stalkers willing to rape unwilling partners, and that is so not what BDSM is.
BDSM is exploring the limits of what you and your partner are capable of inside a safe controlled environment. It is the incredible hieghts of pleasure brought by pain, given by a trusted lover, but also it is the hour of cuddling at the end of a scene to emotionally recover from what you both endured.
Predators, and sick minded individuals have no place in the BDSM community. We don’t need your illness here, we are plenty deviant enough for ourselves.
YES!!! Thank you!
I’ve been in a few abuse situations from childhood to my late 20s, with different perps. I also worked for six years in a crisis centre for those who had been through abuse. Christian Grey mirrors so much of my abusive relationships, and so much of the relationships my clients went through.
He’s the type of perp who would wind up killing prostituted women.
From recent media, it sounds as if ELJames is herself abusive to people. Which would account for her unbelievable lack of awareness concerning the characters in these books and their relationship.
OMG thank you – if i see one more comment on my FB about this being a love story I will throw up. Abuse plain and simple x
You should reply to all those comments with quotes from the books showing just how wrong they are.
Yeah, but because E.L. Fudge wrote them, she will only see them as bold and brilliant and the gospel truth. I feel like she KNOWS she’s wrong but simply refuses to ever admit it because she’s just too damn stupid to know how to save face. Jenny laid it all out perfectly. If E.L. had followed Jenny’s advice from the get-go, she’d have a lot more respect from her detractors. Hell, she’d even have LESS detractors if she knew how to be a decent human being!
[…] to James about how her books reflect back at them the terror of their own experiences. James has refused to listen, saying such criticisms trivialize abuse and demonize women who enjoy […]
This, a million fucking times, this. EL James makes me ashamed for my country. Not for writing a godsawful piece of erotica (I’m 99% sure even the terrible porn I wrote as a horned up teenager was hotter and less repetitive than this shit), but for being such a cunt about it when challenged.
There was an easy way out of this – shit, you said it yourself. If she just said that yes, there’s a lot of problematic themes in there, but it was meant to be a fantasy, nothing more, and no one should take it as having any bearing on reality (y’know, like all the other porn and erotica that totally wouldn’t fly in real life but is still hot to read / watch), we’d be cool, ELJ and I. I mean, the books are still horrible and worth making fun of, but I’d have a modicum of respect for her. Now, between this and the Twitter debacle, I’m torn between hating her for being a twat to abuse victims and everyone else with valid criticisms or just pitying her for not having grown up past her Suethor phase.
I honestly don’t care for you after past controversy’s regarding some nasty blah blah blah with other authors, that beings said I do however FUCKING LOVE THIS ARTICLE and you have earned some definite brownie points for saying what everyone is thinking about E.L Cuntface James. In the spirit of the enemy to my enemy is a friend, My hat’s off to you.
[…] Entrada en el blog de Jenny Trout Blog de Kody […]
While I have never personally faced an abusive relationship with a man (I am like Ana in a lot of ways – naive virgin, etc) I respect the women who have been brave enough to come forward and share their testimonies of abuse and pain. I also want to issue them a personal “thank you” from the bottom of my heart for writing their stories, because they have helped people like me to know what kind of man to avoid. I hope someday to write a book like FSOG/Twilight that exposes Edward/Christian for the heartless scumbag he is, plus a bunch of my own blog posts on this matter which makes me very passionate to speak out. God bless all the brave domestic violence survivors and other men and women who have the guts to stand up for what’s right even when it’s not popular. I could say more but I’ll leave it at that for now.
[…] Again, his family attacked me, saying how dare I call the cops and “made” them arrest him, that I was lying about the whole thing, even when I showed them the bruises, torn shirts, doorless entryways, holes in the walls and piles of shattered glass. I even found out I was pregnant shortly thereafter, suffered through hyperemesis gravidarum (I lost 25 lbs in the first 3 weeks of my pregnancy, had to be hospitalized and had a feeding tube and PICC line for weeks), and miscarried at 11 weeks. His family told me I was LYING, faking my pregnancy, faking my illness, even when presented with the lab work, and ultrasound photos (I was being closely monitored because of the HG).” (x) […]
My husband had bought me the first book only having heard good things and not reading it.
He didn’t know that by the third chapter Chedward acts exactly like my ex husband who was verbally, emotionally and mentally abusive towards me. I threw the book across my room when I got to that part about him being mad that Ana was talking to another guy and had to find my anxiety meds.
These books are toxic.
Nothing makes me angrier than the assholes who dismiss criticism by pretending to care about actual victims. “This trivializes what actual abuse victims go through!” You’re telling me you care about those women, EL?
It’s the same as the rape apologists who say, “Women who lie about rape just make it harder for REAL victims to come forward!” Because the people who say that are ALWAYS the first people to call every victim who comes forward a liar.
It’s the Republican strategy, basically. “We can’t try to help actual victims, because what if we help someone who ISN’T a victim?!?”